Your task: You have to create a photojournal around the concept of COMMUNITY. This community- which you can define in any way you wish- must be within a 5 mile radius of Hult (if you are working remotely, the radius will be within 5 miles of your home).You have to take a series of images (approx. 10) in one of the following styles:DocumentaryFine ArtFashionExpanded DocumentaryYou then need to provide a critical commentary, outlining how you interpreted the notion of community and how your photographs reflect that concept of community (minimum 350 words). The best commentaries will also reference other photographers who have inspired the work. RubricSome Rubric (1)Some Rubric (1)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription and Analysis60.0 to >53.0 ptsExcellentClear, detailed, precise description of works considered. Appropriate and persuasive application of theoretical ideas. Evidence of careful thought and response.53.0 to >48.0 ptsGoodSome descriptive imprecision. Some theoretical confusion or thoughtlessness48.0 to >41.0 ptsAverageSignificant inaccuracies. Significant theoretical misunderstanding or confusion. Evidence of writing without thought.41.0 to >36.0 ptsBelow ParLittle precision or clarity of description. Little or poor use of theoretical ideas. Writing on automatic pilot.36.0 to >0 ptsPoorLittle evidence of observation or understanding. Writing about places you have not visited60.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePhotographic Creativity20.0 to >17.0 ptsExcellentPhotographs clearly relate to the int
erpretation of ‘community’. A clear visual reference to a photographic style is evident across all the images. Careful observation, proficient use of lighting and framing.17.0 to >15.0 ptsGoodPhotographs mostly relate to the interpretation of ‘community’. A sufficient visual reference to a photographic style across most of the images. Minor digressions in observation, use of lighting and framing.15.0 to >13.0 ptsAverageSignificant failures in relating photographs to the interpretation of ‘community’. Poor visual reference to a photographic style. Significant digressions in observation, use of lighting and framing13.0 to >11.0 ptsBelow ParPoor reference to the interpretation of ‘community’. No clear visual reference to a photographic style. Failures in in observation, use of lighting and framing.11.0 to >0 ptsPoorThe execution so poor as to impair understanding. Topic ignored.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and Presentation20.0 to >17.0 ptsExcellentWriting precise, correct, engaging. Editing and proofreading meticulous. Appropriate references in correct style17.0 to >16.0 ptsGoodMinor infelicities in writing. Some typos or other proofreading errors. Occasional lapses in referencing.16.0 to >15.0 ptsAverageSignificant problems with clarity and correctness in writing. Sloppy editing and proofreading. Significant problems in referencing.15.0 to >10.0 ptsBelow ParWriting problems impair understanding. Little evidence of editing or proofreading. Poor referencing.10.0 to >0 ptsPoorWord porridge20.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0