RequirementsLength: 5 pages, double spaced, 12 point fontReference Style: Harvard SystemIn the Harvard system, the authors surname, year of publication, and page umber are cited in the text of your work. The full details of the book are included in a reference list at the end of the paper.Example:In-text citation An effective structure is important (Redman, 2006, p.22)Reference list Redman, P., 2006. Good essay writing: a social sciences guide. 3rd ed. London: Open University in assoc. with Sage. For the full Harvard style referencing guide see: http://libweb.anglia.ac.uk/referencing/harvard.htmPromptRecall, on the first day of class, I asked you to respond briefly, viscerally, to the following moral quandary:âIn 2007, an 11 year old boy, Jakob von Metzler, was kidnapped by a man, Magnus Gaffgen, who planned to collect a ransom. When caught, Gaffgen refused to admit where the boy had been sta
shed. He confessed that he had killed the boy only after the Deputy Police Chief of Frankfurt, Wolfgang Daschner, threatened him with torture. The kidnapper was sentenced to life in prison. Soon thereafter the Police Chief was also arrested and convicted for violating the first principle of the German Constitution, which holds that ârespect for persons shall be inviolableâ.âYour final paper assignment is to re-read your first-day response and re-condition it based upon the material we have engaged over the course of the semester. Do you still agree with yourself? Why, or why not? What moral assumptions underpinned your original response? Were those assumptions logically sound (i.e. self-consistent)? Now that you have become more sophisticated in your approach to moral questions, which moral philosophy(ies)/philosopher(s) would you argue prepares us best to respond to this scenario and why?