This assignment will require you to take the PICO, 5 research articles and place them in a table for analysis. You will critique each article and identify the most important parts of the research, analysis, and findings. Then you will summarize the articles by grading the research, and identifying gaps in the literature as well as possible interventions (see grading rubric and examples). 1. Identify your PICO or research question of interest 2. Gather 5 articles on your topic: 3. If you can’t answer a lot of the questions, it is probably not a research article. 4. that you use more than one qualitative research article or systematic review or meta analysis. These are harder to evaluate because they have so much more information in them. Remember it is not individuals in these studies- it is the articles. Use the reference list in the systematic reviews or meta analyses to find individual studies that may be easier to understand and use. 5. Review sample matrices and summaries ATTACHED 6. Use matrix table- one for each article and critique the parts of the article using the rubric-(RUBRIC IS ATTACHED) 7. Be sure to identify the evaluation tool used to grade the evidence such as (See below for grading the evidence tools) 8. Identify where there are issues with the articles and what gaps were not addressed with the research; be prepared this may change the way you look at your topic or may result in a slightly different direction for your area of interest. This is ok- that is what you want to accomplish with this assignment. It will really assist you as you move forward with your project. 9. For this assignment you will turn in the matrix tables, summary, references and pdf copies of your 5 article
s. 10. 1. the process used to evaluate the level of evidence of your articles- such as Jones Hopkins, Cincinnati Children’s evaluation etc, 2. : use the method and describe how you arrived at the scoring or knowing that the article included all content it needed to- such as CASP; 3. What type of instrument or tool was used in the article? This could be a depression screening tool, Nurse satisfaction tool etc. Describe the instrument- how many questions, reliability- consistency with test-retest, Cronbach Alpha, inter-rater reliablity; validity with content validity, face validity Joanna Briggs Institute (joannabriggs.org) 1. PICO Format • P = Nurses in an inpatient hospital experiencing burnout • I = Using a mindfulness-based program • C = no intervention at all • O = To reduce nurse burnout • T = within a 6-month period MY PICOT QUESTION: For nurses in an inpatient hospital experiencing burnout, does the introduction and usage of a mindfulness-based program versus no intervention at all reduce their burnout within 6 months? all the articles are attached. Alyssa A. Green, BSN, RN Elizabeth V. Kinchen, PhD, RN, AHN-BC Donna M. Wampole DSWa and Sara Bressi PhD, LSW Mathilde Sauvain-Sabé, Anne Congard, Jean-Luc Kop, Catherine Weismann-Arcache, and Arnaud Villieux Online First Publication, February 10, 2022. londonessays.com Vinayak Deva , Antonio T. Fernando IIIa , Anecita Gigi Limb , Nathan S. Consedine Elisabeth Diehl, Sandra Rieger, Stephan Letzel, Anja Schablon, Albert Nienhaus, Luis Carlos Escobar Pinzon, Pavel DietzID ANNA MARCONI, MARIA ANTONIETTA BÀLZOLA, RAMONA GATTO, ANNALISA SORESINI, DIANA MABILIA & STEFANO POLETTI* Naomi Kakoschke, Craig Hassed, Richard Chambers, Kevin Lee