Blog

No outside sources.  Sources must come from Chapters 15 & 16 of the Reilly Textbook, and any web course readings from Weeks 1 & 2: & Also, it is very important that you review the Here is a graphic organizer to help you keep track of all the potential sources you can use: http://www-tc.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/assets/img/ancient-chinese-explorers/image-01-large.jpg In the fifteenth century, China appeared on the verge of a large-scale maritime empire throughout the seas, bays, gulfs and straits of the Indian Ocean.  Whereas, Western Europe was an economic and technological backwater in comparison.  How and/or why did Western Europe emerge as the dominant force on the world’s economic and political scene instead of China? In the fifteenth century, the world’s major economic regions appeared either prepared, or not as prepared, to enter the emerging global marketplace.  Why was Western Europe able to emerge as the dominant force on the world’s economic and political scene? (nt: Think Comparatively) In fact, keep it handy. You will notice that the rubric reflects key components for assessment. 1. The , .  Since I urge you to take ownership of your arguments/ideas, consider using this formula to write your thesis: Writing your thesis statement in this format will help with the development of your argument. For instance, don’t just state your position. Instead, explain why you believe the way you do. Be advised that writing in first person (using ‘I’) is not always accepted in other courses, or even among other history instructors. The introduction should be one paragraph; but two is the max. 2. The . Notice that a minimum of three claims are needed to support your thesis (prove your point). You cannot make a claim, and give only one or two explanations; that is a weak substantiation, and your argument will appear unconvincing. A historian’s evidence includes primary sources, as well as secondary sources; but Primary Sources hold more value. Make sure that your claims are backed by specific evidence. For instance, when you refer to your sources explain what they are, or at least list the title and/or author. Anytime you provide evidence, make sure that it lists proper citations. This is how historians prove that we are not making things up. Check our readings for sample citations that I provided in Chicago Manual/Turabian. 3. The conclusion should consist of one, but no more than two paragraphs. For a killer paper, with added sophistication- try including a counter argument prior to conclusion. However, you need to also explain why this counter-argument, although valid, is not as powerful as your thesis statement. Counter arguments are usually key indicators that students have thought about their essay critica

lly. 4. Try to make your prose read as smoothly as possible. You can do this by PROOFREADING and running essay through Grammar and Spell Check. Also, include transition words/phrases to prevent choppy writing. Although Even though Though But Yet However For example For instance As a result Therefore In contrast Likewise Meanwhile Indeed In fact Incidentally Coincidentally Often Oftentimes In effect Write your essay using rubric and guidelines. a. PAPER MUST INCLUDE A BIBLIOGRAPHY (in MLA, they call this a works cited page) and CITATIONS USING CHICAGO MANUAL/TURABIAN style format embedded in your text. b. Use Times New Roman, 12 point font, and only 1 inch margins. c. Paper must have a separate cover sheet. Include a title (Paper 1 is not a good title), course (HIST 2322), your name and date on this cover sheet. d. This is a 3-5 page, double-spaced paper. This excludes your title page and bibliography. e. Some exceptions can be made in order to make some minor points. However, contact me first. A successful paper will include f. Run through spell and grammar check. Turn in your essay through submission link found in this learning module by due date indicated. Argumentative Essay Rubric (50 x 2) 2.0 (3)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis Statement 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClaim 1 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClaim 1: Supporting Evidence 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClaim 1 Citations 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClaim 2 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClaim 2:Supporting Evidence 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClaim 2: Citations 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClaim 3 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClaim 3: Supporting Evidence 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClaim 3: Citations 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCounter Argument 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Writing: Mechanics 1.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization 1.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle/Diction 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetails: Information Literacy 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetails: Instructions 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality/Thoughtfulness 5.0 pts Total Points: 50.0 Nov 10 at 11:01pm Grade: 0 (100 pts possible)Graded Anonymously: no